Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Put all FIRs Online : Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has directed city Police Commissioner B K Gupta to ensure that all the First Information Reports (FIRs) lodged by the police are put on its website within 24 hours of the complaint being filed. 

A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Manmohan said yesterday that receiving a copy of the FIR is a right of the accused and it comes under the right to information and right to life. 

The copy must be handed over to the accused first. 

The High Court directed that the order should be implemented soon and should come into force from February 1, 2011. 

The High Court's directions came on a letter written by an individual drawing its attention to the accused's right to get a copy of the FIR. Since, at present there is no rule that an accused has a right to immediately get the copy of FIR after it is filed. 

The court converted the letter into a petition. 

Under section 207 of the CrPC, the copy of FIR and other documents are provided to the accused only when the charge sheet is filed in court. Section 154 of CrPC provides only the complainant has the right to receive the copy of FIR. 

Amicus curie Arvind Nigam, appointed by the court earlier, submitted that recording of FIR is an official act of a public official in discharge of his official duties and, therefore, it becomes a public document. 

The court ruled that fair and impartial investigation is a facet of article 21 of the Constitution (Right to life and liberty), and is the statutory duty of a police officer to provide an accused free copies of police report, first information report and all other documents and relevant extracts. 

Additional Solicitor General A S Chandhiok, appearing on behalf of Delhi, submitted that an accused is not entitled to receive an FIR in certain cases like kidnapping for ransom, cases involving trauma like murder and rape, cases dealing with gangsters where life of witnesses is threatened, cases related to terrorists and national security and those registered under the Official Secrets Act. 

The High Court directed the police to constitute a three-member committee of higher officers within eight weeks to deal with his or her grievances in case of denial of copy of FIR on the ground of cases being sensitive in nature which will dispose of the representation of the accused within three days from the date of receiving them.

No Move to Regulate Lawyers' Fees: Moily

Source : Indlaw

The government has no proposal under consideration to regulate the fees charged by lawyers, Rajya Sabha was told through a written reply on Monday available today. 

'No such proposal is under consideration of the government,' Law and Justice Minister M Veerappa Moily said, answering Congress member from Andhra Pradesh Raashid Alvi. 

The member had asked whether the 'government is considering to regulate the fees charged by the lawyers' and whether India's judicial system needed reform to provide justice to everyone. 

Dr Moily cited such steps as limiting adjournments to three or increasing judges' strength in High Courts and Supreme Courts. 

He said the government has decided 'in principle' to set up a National Mission for Justice Delivery and Legal Reforms to reduce the period of pendency in courts from an average of 15 years to three years by 2012.

Monday, December 6, 2010

Newsletter : Week 4 : Turbulent Times

The last fortnight has seen drama and scandal unfold in the legal world. While the media was called up to do some soul searching in the wake of the Radia-Gate controversy, the judges of the Allahabad High Court picked up a fight with their counterparts sitting in the Apex Court.


The Delhi High Court saw the appointment of 2 new Judges, who were elevated from the Delhi Higher Judicial Services. Justice(s) G.P. Mittal and M.L. Mehta have had distinguished careers as judges in the District Courts in Delhi and have been rewarded by the promotion as Additional Judges of the Delhi High Court. At the same time, Justice V.B. Gupta of the Delhi High Court retired from judicial services upon attaining the age of retirement. The Legal Blog wishes all of them the best.

The last month has been a turbulent time as far as legal education is concerned. With the postponement of the Bar Council exam, the future of fresh graduates was put in doubt. Accusations against the Chairman of the Bar Council of India, Gopal Subramanium surfaced and there was speculation that he might be asked to step down from his post. This and more made the news this fortnight;


Legal News

Parliament passes Railway Appropriation Bills



Articles

Competition Laws : Powers and Functions of the Competition Commission of India : The Law

Precedentiary Value of Judgments : The Law

Jurisdiction of Courts in Passing Off Actions : The LawCBFC Certification Mandatory : Delhi High Court


Announcements

Introducing Lex Crawler : The Best Legal Search Engine

It is our pleasure to introduce you to Lex Crawler.

This simple but effective tool allows users to search the Legal Internet with ease. Searches are refined specifically keeping in mind the needs of the legal fraternity, and the aim is to make the search accessible and simple.

Lex Crawler uses Google's effective search crawlers and spiders to index the best legal information available on the web. The information is then refined to specifically cater to searches related to Indian legal sites, which makes this resource a must have for all concerned.

As of now, Lex Crawler indexes free websites / resources but very soon we shall offer premium / paid content to our customers from a wide variety of Indian and International websites.


To submit your Link to enable us to index the same and add it to our list of sites Click Here.

Happy Searching.

Establish Supreme Court Bench in South India

Source : The Hindu

The Forum for Supreme Court Bench in south India on Saturday requested the Chief Justice of India and the President to take positive steps to establish a Bench of the Supreme Court in the South. If the request is not fulfilled, 2.50 lakh laywers practising in the South would be compelled to abstain from courts and go on an indefinite fast before the Supreme Court and Parliament.

A resolution to this effect was adopted at the forum's meeting here. A joint action committee (JAC) was formed and it would convene a meeting of lawyers of the four Southern States and Puducherry in March/April next year.

The resolution said that more than 100 law colleges had come up in the Southern States which had more than 2.50 lakh lawyers.

Percentage of litigation

Litigation in the Supreme Court from this part of the country was 25 per cent. This necessitated establishing a Supreme Court Bench in the South. Poor people were virtually denied the right to approach the apex court due to the time and distance involved. The country's population had increased in the last 60 years which necessitated the establishment of Supreme Court Benches.

Legal Blog on the Social Networks

Loading
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...